For many adopted children, the concept of "letterbox contact" has long been the norm. This arrangement—often involving indirect communication through letters or emails—has traditionally been the default approach for maintaining connections with birth families post-adoption. However, a newly released report suggests that this practice may now be outdated and in need of reform.

On Friday, 7 November 2024, the Public Law Working Group published a report aimed at those working in the family court arena. The report, which can be accessed here , is both thought-provoking and timely. It highlights the urgent need for changes in the adoption process and recommends moving beyond the default reliance on letterbox contact. Most notably, it advocates for face-to-face contact between children and their birth families where it is safe and appropriate.

Key recommendations from the report

Adoption in England is governed by the Family Court, which has the final say in approving adoption plans. As part of this process, judges must consider what, if any, contact should be maintained between the child and their birth family post-adoption. Historically, this has often resulted in letterbox contact being the only form of communication recommended. However, the new report, supported by Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division, challenges this practice.

Sir Andrew McFarlane emphasizes that while there is no immediate need to change the law itself, the standard approach to contact requires a significant cultural shift. The report highlights that face-to-face contact, where it can be safely facilitated, should become a viable option. This recommendation reflects a growing recognition of the importance of maintaining meaningful connections for the child’s identity and emotional well-being.

Why is change necessary?

The traditional reliance on letterbox contact often stems from a desire to protect the child and the adoptive family from potential disruption or harm. However, critics argue that this approach does not sufficiently consider the potential benefits of direct contact, such as:

• Strengthening the child’s sense of identity: Understanding their origins can help children make sense of their personal story.
• Preserving emotional connections: Safe and positive interactions with birth family members can provide reassurance and stability.
• Reducing stigma and secrecy: Open communication can help normalize the child’s experiences and reduce feelings of shame or confusion.

The way forward

The report’s recommendations are a call to action for professionals working in the adoption and family court sectors. By moving towards a more flexible and child-focused approach, it is possible to balance the need for safety with the benefits of maintaining meaningful relationships. Each case must be carefully assessed, with the child’s best interests as the guiding principle.

How we can help

If you have questions about adoption, contact arrangements, or other family matters, our team of experienced Children Panel Accredited Solicitors is here to help.

We can provide tailored advice and support to ensure the best outcomes for your family. To learn more, get in touch with us today. Call us on 0800 1380 458 or email help@switalskis.com